This case involves a recent labor rights controversy surrounding Russell Athletic, one of the University of Michigan’s primary providers of collegiate athletic clothing. Russell had been a trustworthy and responsible supplier to the University for years, but the committee was very concerned about Russell’s decision to close a manufacturing facility in Honduras, a move that had received severe condemnation from some labor rights groups. The B case updates students on the February 9, 2009 action taken by the University of Michigan’s President’s Advisory Committee on Labor Standards and Human Rights.
Russell Athletic Tries to Keep the Shirt on Its Back (B)
by: Brian Talbot
Click on any button below to view the available document.
Make sure you are registered and/or logged in to our site to view product documents. Once registered & approved, faculty, staff, & course aggregators will have access to full inspection copies and teaching notes for any of our materials.
If you need to make copies, you MUST purchase the corresponding number of permissions, and you must own a single copy of the product.
Electronic Downloads are available immediately after purchase. "Quantity" reflects the number of copies you intend to use. Unauthorized distribution of these files is prohibited pursuant to term of use of this website.
This product does not have a teaching note.
After reading and discussing the material, students should:
- describe a labor rights controversy surrounding Russell Athletic,
- analyze potential courses of action the University might take,
- assess the role of the University in makig decisions about its brand.